January

<str

The Galiorka Colleague

This is a list of Nida’s FB posts of January: the hyperlink on the date leads to FB, plus I supplied each with a short summary and casual notes (e.g. on comments).

Why? – The Galiorka Colleague is convinced that half the trouble with the dissent comes from misadaptation to internet of people in general (the other half being malevolent agents). – People had lost, or failed to develop, instrumentary attitude to the internet, and got thrown into the back seat of interpassivity with it; as a result, they merely agree that, say, a party should be created, and the inconsequencial issuing of yays and nays – intercept any inner impetus to be proactive, in it’s very inception. (NB: I am not blaming anyone; it’s not us, it’s tentacles of the internet itself, a sentinel and misanthropic entity.)

Via M.McLuhan I have a donquijotic “hope for invisible things”, that this interpassivity can be tampered with on tactical level, by putting emphasis of development of discourses in time, and positioning them in their context, i.e. in a multiplicity of discourses. Bring back the bird-eye view, the God-perspective, the book! – First of all, it would plainly prolong exposure to a post. Second, on the side of author the duration of development of an idea would increase. Third, maybe the sense of a logos moving, responding, absorbing, fighting, the full list of life-scenes of that little animal, would anchor in muscles of the reader and break the spell of the screen. Finally, the more obvious negative disciplinary effect would be that one may abstain from talking points already used ad nauseam in longer period of time.

Hence the timeline, to be repeated next month, as to gather the hyperlinks and summarize is not exhaustive at all. I suspect it appears so; oh no, the whole thing is a half-an-hour activity.

–

 

25.01.01 Stupidity considered vice of character in Antiquity
25.01.02 Contra antisemitic comments at expence on the post on Roman New year
25.01.04 Contra Navys
25.01.04 Contra usage of culture in propaganda
25.01.05 German soldiers and Hoelderlin
25.01.06 Disrespecting Šalkauskis? – This has a major commenting trend
25.01.07 Are there really great LT philosophers?
25.01.08 The discourse of granting survival of humankind as nietzschean “last man” talk
25.01.09 Contra Diana Apal: the fallacy of inflating national philosophers as if real
25.01.10 Conservatives as idealists?
25.01.11 “Fox hunt”: C. Pavilionis
25.01.11 The commedy of psychologists’ guild (another post that attracted lots of commenting)
25.01.12 True value (-lessness) of modern diploma
25.01.13 The commedy of getting recruited for state influencers if jobless
25.01.14 Off with sleeping pills (38 comments)
25.01.14 Vaga misrepresents LT2
25.01.15 On the medic that refused to speak Russian (most commented!)
25.01.16 Contra Vytautas V. Landsbergis whitewashing his father as a cute oldie
25.01.18” Fox hunt”: Landsbergiai vs defense budget
25.01.21 Reacting to reactions to Trump inauguration
25.01.23 Same PR style for Ukraine and plandemics
25.01.25 “Fox hunt”: Putin as postmodern thinker?
25.01.25 Postmodern critique of objectivity
25.01.27 The on-air discussion about vanished G.Landsbergis, Sabaliauskaitė and other news
25.01.28 The genre “books for youth” should not exist.
25.01.29 Mažeikis disowns phantasia
25.01.30 Jonušys’ unnecessary and misguiding comment in Rushdie translation, an observation

sts/pfbid032oFxfqgn2HpC4ihZC1657Xg1SQYCuZw9wAj8aB82FmiyRtCpB3irfppEdxQ7Q7pEl”>25.01.30 Jonušys’ unnecessary and misguiding comment in Rushdie translation, an observation